Testing Vue Router

This article will present two ways to test an application using Vue Router:

Using the real Vue Router, which is more production like but also may lead to complexity when testing larger applications
Using a mocked router, allowing for more fine grained control of the testing environment.

Notice that Vue Test Utils does not provide any special functions to assist with testing components that rely on Vue Router.

Using a Mocked Router

You can use a mocked router to avoid caring about the implementation details of Vue Router in your unit tests.

Instead of using a real Vue Router instance, we can create a mock version which only implements the features we are interested in. We can do this using a combination of jest.mock (if you are using Jest), and global.components.

When we mock out a dependency, it's usually because we are not interested in testing its behavior. We don't want to test clicking <router-link> navigates to the correct page - of course it does! We might be interested in ensuring that the <a> has the correct to attribute, though.

Let's see a more realistic example! This component shows a button that will redirect an authenticated user to the edit post page (based on the current route parameters). An unauthenticated user should be redirected to a /404 route.

const Component = {
  template: `<button @click="redirect">Click to Edit</button>`,
  props: ['isAuthenticated'],
  methods: {
    redirect() {
      if (this.isAuthenticated) {
        this.$router.push(`/posts/${this.$route.params.id}/edit`)
      } else {
        this.$router.push('/404')
      }
    }
  }
}

We could use a real router, then navigate to the correct route for this component, then after clicking the button assert that the correct page is rendered... however, this is a lot of setup for a relatively simple test. At its core, the test we want to write is "if authenticated, redirect to X, otherwise redirect to Y". Let's see how we might accomplish this by mocking the routing using the global.mocks property:

import { mount } from '@vue/test-utils';

test('allows authenticated user to edit a post', async () => {
  const mockRoute = {
    params: {
      id: 1
    }
  }
  const mockRouter = {
    push: jest.fn()
  }

  const wrapper = mount(Component, {
    props: {
      isAuthenticated: true
    },
    global: {
      mocks: {
        $route: mockRoute,
        $router: mockRouter
      }
    }
  })

  await wrapper.find('button').trigger('click')

  expect(mockRouter.push).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
  expect(mockRouter.push).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/posts/1/edit')
})

test('redirect an unauthenticated user to 404', async () => {
  const mockRoute = {
    params: {
      id: 1
    }
  }
  const mockRouter = {
    push: jest.fn()
  }

  const wrapper = mount(Component, {
    props: {
      isAuthenticated: false
    },
    global: {
      mocks: {
        $route: mockRoute,
        $router: mockRouter
      }
    }
  })

  await wrapper.find('button').trigger('click')

  expect(mockRouter.push).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
  expect(mockRouter.push).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/404')
})

We used global.mocks to provide the necessary dependencies (this.$route and this.$router) to set an ideal state for each test.

We were then able to use jest.fn() to monitor how many times, and with which arguments, this.$router.push was called with. Best of all, we don't have to deal with the complexity or caveats of Vue Router in our test! We were only concerned with testing the app logic.

TIP

You might want to test the entire system in an end-to-end manner. You could consider a framework like Cypress for full system tests using a real browser.

Using a Real Router

Now we have seen how to use a mocked router, let's take a look at using the real Vue Router.

Let's create a basic blogging application that uses Vue Router. The posts are listed on the /posts route:

const App = {
  template: `
    <router-link to="/posts">Go to posts</router-link>
    <router-view />
  `
}

const Posts = {
  template: `
    <h1>Posts</h1>
    <ul>
      <li v-for="post in posts" :key="post.id">
        {{ post.name }}
      </li>
    </ul>
  `,
  data() {
    return {
      posts: [{ id: 1, name: 'Testing Vue Router' }]
    }
  }
}

The root of the app displays a <router-link> leading to /posts, where we list the posts.

The real router looks like this. Notice that we're exporting the routes separately from the route, so that we can instantiate a new router for each individual test later.

import { createRouter, createWebHistory } from 'vue-router'

const routes = [
  {
    path: '/',
    component: {
      template: 'Welcome to the blogging app'
    }
  },
  {
    path: '/posts',
    component: Posts
  }
];

const router = createRouter({
  history: createWebHistory(),
  routes: routes,
})

export { routes };

export default router;

The best way to illustrate how to test an app using Vue Router is to let the warnings guide us. The following minimal test is enough to get us going:

import { mount } from '@vue/test-utils'

test('routing', () => {
  const wrapper = mount(App)
  expect(wrapper.html()).toContain('Welcome to the blogging app')
})

The test fails. It also prints two warnings:

console.warn node_modules/@vue/runtime-core/dist/runtime-core.cjs.js:39
  [Vue warn]: Failed to resolve component: router-link

console.warn node_modules/@vue/runtime-core/dist/runtime-core.cjs.js:39
  [Vue warn]: Failed to resolve component: router-view

The <router-link> and <router-view> component are not found. We need to install Vue Router! Since Vue Router is a plugin, we install it using the global.plugins mounting option:

import { mount } from '@vue/test-utils'
import { createRouter, createWebHistory } from 'vue-router'
import { routes } from "@/router" // This import should point to your routes file declared above

const router = createRouter({
  history: createWebHistory(),
  routes: routes,
})

test('routing', () => {
  const wrapper = mount(App, {
    global: {
      plugins: [router]
    }
  })
  expect(wrapper.html()).toContain('Welcome to the blogging app')
})

Those two warnings are now gone - but now we have another warning:

console.warn node_modules/vue-router/dist/vue-router.cjs.js:225
  [Vue Router warn]: Unexpected error when starting the router: TypeError: Cannot read property '_history' of null

Although it's not entirely clear from the warning, it's related to the fact that Vue Router 4 handles routing asynchronously.

Vue Router provides an isReady function that tell us when router is ready. We can then await it to ensure the initial navigation has happened.

import { mount } from '@vue/test-utils'
import { createRouter, createWebHistory } from 'vue-router'
import { routes } from "@/router"

const router = createRouter({
  history: createWebHistory(),
  routes: routes,
})

test('routing', async () => {
  router.push('/')

  // After this line, router is ready
  await router.isReady()

  const wrapper = mount(App, {
    global: {
      plugins: [router]
    }
  })
  expect(wrapper.html()).toContain('Welcome to the blogging app')
})

The test is now passing! It was quite a bit of work, but now we make sure the application is properly navigating to the initial route.

Now let's navigate to /posts and make sure the routing is working as expected:

import { mount } from '@vue/test-utils'
import { createRouter, createWebHistory } from 'vue-router'
import { routes } from "@/router"

const router = createRouter({
  history: createWebHistory(),
  routes: routes,
})

test('routing', async () => {
  router.push('/')
  await router.isReady()

  const wrapper = mount(App, {
    global: {
      plugins: [router]
    }
  })
  expect(wrapper.html()).toContain('Welcome to the blogging app')

  await wrapper.find('a').trigger('click')
  expect(wrapper.html()).toContain('Testing Vue Router')
})

Again, another somewhat cryptic error:

console.warn node_modules/@vue/runtime-core/dist/runtime-core.cjs.js:39
  [Vue warn]: Unhandled error during execution of native event handler
    at <RouterLink to="/posts" >

console.error node_modules/@vue/runtime-core/dist/runtime-core.cjs.js:211
  TypeError: Cannot read property '_history' of null

Again, due to Vue Router 4's new asynchronous nature, we need to await the routing to complete before making any assertions.

In this case, however, there is no hasNavigated hook we can await on. One alternative is to use the flushPromises function exported from Vue Test Utils:

import { mount, flushPromises } from '@vue/test-utils'
import { createRouter, createWebHistory } from 'vue-router'
import { routes } from "@/router"

const router = createRouter({
  history: createWebHistory(),
  routes: routes,
})

test('routing', async () => {
  router.push('/')
  await router.isReady()

  const wrapper = mount(App, {
    global: {
      plugins: [router]
    }
  })
  expect(wrapper.html()).toContain('Welcome to the blogging app')

  await wrapper.find('a').trigger('click')
  await flushPromises()
  expect(wrapper.html()).toContain('Testing Vue Router')
})

It finally passes. Great! This is all very manual, however - and this is for a tiny, trivial app. This is the reason using a mocked router is a common approach when testing Vue components using Vue Test Utils. In case you prefer to keep using a real router, keep in mind that each test should use it's own instance of the router like so:

import { mount, flushPromises } from '@vue/test-utils'
import { createRouter, createWebHistory } from 'vue-router'
import { routes } from "@/router"

let router;
beforeEach(async () => {
  router = createRouter({
    history: createWebHistory(),
    routes: routes,
  })
});

test('routing', async () => {
  router.push('/')
  await router.isReady()

  const wrapper = mount(App, {
    global: {
      plugins: [router]
    }
  })
  expect(wrapper.html()).toContain('Welcome to the blogging app')

  await wrapper.find('a').trigger('click')
  await flushPromises()
  expect(wrapper.html()).toContain('Testing Vue Router')
})

Using a mocked router with Composition API

Vue router 4 allows for working with the router and route inside the setup function with the composition API.

Consider the same demo component rewritten using the composition API.

import { useRouter, useRoute } from 'vue-router'

const Component = {
  template: `<button @click="redirect">Click to Edit</button>`,
  props: ['isAuthenticated'],
  setup (props) {
    const router = useRouter()
    const route = useRoute()

    const redirect = () => {
      if (props.isAuthenticated) {
        router.push(`/posts/${route.params.id}/edit`)
      } else {
        router.push('/404')
      }
    }

    return {
      redirect
    }
  }
}

This time in order to test the component, we will use jest's ability to mock an imported resource, vue-router and mock both the router and route directly.

import { useRouter, useRoute } from 'vue-router'

jest.mock('vue-router', () => ({
  useRoute: jest.fn(),
  useRouter: jest.fn(() => ({
    push: () => {}
  }))
}))

test('allows authenticated user to edit a post', () => {
  useRoute.mockImplementationOnce(() => ({
    params: {
      id: 1
    }
  }))

  const push = jest.fn()
  useRouter.mockImplementationOnce(() => ({
    push
  }))

  const wrapper = mount(Component, {
    props: {
      isAuthenticated: true
    },
    global: {
      stubs: ["router-link", "router-view"], // Stubs for router-link and router-view in case they're rendered in your template
    }
  })

  await wrapper.find('button').trigger('click')

  expect(push).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
  expect(push).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/posts/1/edit')
})

test('redirect an unauthenticated user to 404', () => {
  useRoute.mockImplementationOnce(() => ({
    params: {
      id: 1
    }
  }))

  const push = jest.fn()
  useRouter.mockImplementationOnce(() => ({
    push
  }))

  const wrapper = mount(Component, {
    props: {
      isAuthenticated: false
    }
    global: {
      stubs: ["router-link", "router-view"], // Stubs for router-link and router-view in case they're rendered in your template
    }
  })

  await wrapper.find('button').trigger('click')

  expect(push).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
  expect(push).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/404')
})

Using a real router with Composition API

Using a real router with Composition API works the same as using a real router with Options API. Keep in mind that, just as is the case with Options API, it's considered a good practice to instantiate a new router object for each test, instead of importing the router directly from your app.

import { mount, flushPromises } from '@vue/test-utils'
import { createRouter, createWebHistory } from 'vue-router'
import { routes } from "@/router"

let router;

beforeEach(async () => {
  router = createRouter({
    history: createWebHistory(),
    routes: routes,
  })

  router.push('/')
  await router.isReady()
});

test('allows authenticated user to edit a post', async () => {
  const wrapper = mount(Component, {
    props: {
      isAuthenticated: true
    },
    global: {
      plugins: [router],
    }
  })

  const push = jest.spyOn(router, 'push')
  await wrapper.find('button').trigger('click')

  expect(push).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
  expect(push).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/posts/1/edit')
})

For those who prefer a non-manual approach, the library vue-router-mock created by Posva is also available as an alternative.

Conclusion

You can use a real router instance in your tests.
There are some caveats, though: Vue Router 4 is asynchronous, and we need to take it into account when writing tests.
For more complex applications, consider mocking the router dependency and focus on testing the underlying logic.
Make use of your test runner's stubbing/mocking functionality where possible.
Use global.mocks to mock global dependencies, such as this.$route and this.$router.

Testing Vuex

Testing Teleport

Testing Vue Router #

Using a Mocked Router #

Using a Real Router #

Using a mocked router with Composition API #